EMPLOYEE THEFT MOVES INTO ONLINE MARKETPLACES

August 8, 2015 by Leave a Comment

theft (13)This past month, I closed out one of the biggest employee theft cases of my career thus far. While it was quite exciting and a huge win for my team, it left a lot of questions about our internal controls, that after this case, surely must evolve. Lots of people that I come into to contact with really misconstrue the facts regarding employee theft. You’ve heard the phrase before… “You have more internal theft than external theft.” Every time I hear this phrase, I find myself trying to educate the manager on this. While most people assume that 75% percent of their employees steal, realistically, only a very small percentage of employees engage in this behavior. Those that do though, create a substantial financial loss to the company.

As part of my investigative routine, I normally check online sale sites for possible stolen merchandise. Selling stolen product online is most likely to quickest and easiest way to get rid of goods in a hurry. As I was browsing through I noticed a pair of wireless headphones that had just hit our stores. Interesting enough, the item still had our company markings on it. From there I was able to quickly identify the geographical area and before long I was able to identify the owner of the page. That owner was a warehouse supervisor at one of my stores.

Well, it didn’t take long for me to find quite literally, hundreds and hundreds of items either that had previously been sold, or were up for sale on this website. Lots of these items were electronics such as cameras, headphones, accessories, phone cases and other large bulk product such as coolers and outdoor furniture. Looking at the store’s inventory I could tell that some of the product had in fact come from that location. Over the course of several weeks, I initiated several online purchases. Most were for electronic devices that had a serial number. Once received, I was able to determine that the items did in fact belong to that store and those particular items were not accounted for. I had made my case.

How was this associate getting this much product out the door without anyone noticing him? I still didn’t have that piece of the puzzle. Without enough ammunition for prosecution, I interviewed this supervisor to determine how he was obtaining this much product. I knew it was stolen, I just didn’t know by whom and in what manner. What I uncovered during this interview was one of the most sophisticated and organized theft operations I have seen in my career.

That particular store was also a hub warehouse. This means that online purchases made by customers in a certain geographical area would be sent to our store and warehouse to fulfill. This of course gets the item to the customer much faster than going through our centralized distribution center. Once the order was filled for a customer, it would be packed and set in a designated area and a private mail delivery service would pick up once a day.

The supervisor had gained access to the shipping account, so he was able to ship product out without anyone second guessing the boxes. At first, according to our records and his online account, he was shipping merchandise directly to his customer’s houses. He said that he thought that was a bit risky and ultimately began shipping massive quantities of merchandise to a vacant home close to his. Each day, he would pass by and take the packages from the porch. From there, he would run his online store. This had been going on for the past two years. This one employee, working alone had taken nearly $250K worth of merchandise over this time period.

With the dishonest employee out of our store, we focused on what went wrong. We began a program of inspecting all boxes and shipments prior to them being sealed and implemented a system that a number of shipping boxes each day could be verified. We also set up exception style reports that showed any time a delivery was sent to the same address more than 5 times a month. This was a costly lesson for us to learn and hopefully with better controls and more oversight, it will never happen again.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Credit Card Fraud and the Rollout of EMV

July 2, 2015 by Leave a Comment

shopliftingSome major changes are taking shape this year to help combat the ever rising prevalence of identity theft and credit card fraud. With it comes some confusion for the small business owner. Credit card fraud (duplicated cards, cloned credit cards, data breaches…etc) losses mount in the hundreds of millions of dollars every year. The numbers are doubling every couple of years. Chances are, you’ve been the victim, you’ve known someone who’s been a victim, or someone (or a group of someones) have used fraudulent credit cards in your store before. The new EMV (Europay, MasterCard and Visa) aims to derail these operations by installing a tiny computer chip on your credit card, instead of using a magnetic strip (which can be very easily duplicated). The “deadline” issued by the major credit card companies is October 15, 2015. That doesn’t mean everyone will be onboard though. You can bet that those large retailers will have the new software and POS systems in place, but where does that leave small businesses? What can you expect from this? And the big question is, how much is it going to cost you?

Basically, the United States is behind most other countries in the developed world with regards to credit card security. It’s time for us to play catch-up, but it could lead to some pretty substantive business expenses. Currently, cards issued in the US have a magnetic strip on the back of the card, which is swiped at the point of sale. That magnetic strip contains unchanging data. If a fraudster (think massive data breaches over the last few years), gets the information contained in the strip, credit cards can be duplicated, replicated and counterfeited, and thus the booming fraudulent credit card industry is born. It’s such a problem that law enforcement is overwhelmed. It’s impossible for them to investigate every time a card is used; they simply do not have the resources. Federal agencies focus on the counterfeiters themselves, but more often than not they are made overseas, far out of the reach of US prosecution. Enter EMV.

New cards, which have already begun hitting consumer pockets, will have a tiny computer chip embedded in the card. At first, they will also contain a magnetic strip (a backup until all businesses are 100% compliant). Unlike the strip, the computer chip will be inserted into the businesses POS via a card reader and a unique transaction code generated for each transaction, making cloned or counterfeit cards virtually impossible. It means a more secured card and less risk on the back of the issuer. In addition, the liability of loss will eventually shift from the issuer to the less EMV compliant party (the business). Basically, if a fraudster uses a fraudulent credit card in your store, you very well could be liable for those charges if you don’t have the proper technology installed.

This radical shift has both positive and negative impacts. First of all, it will reduce brick and mortar credit card fraud. On the opposite side, it will more than likely push the fraud to an e-com platform. Europe has seen this happen over the last few years. This will no doubt happen here as well. Criminals will always find a way. Second, small business owners like yourself will have to incur the cost of updating your payment processing systems. In some cases, it may be a few hundred dollars, but the costs can spiral into the thousands depending on your particular business and how your POS is currently set up. While I think this was a great step in the right direction to minimize fraud, I think the small business community will face some initial costs associate with the transition, as well as a tad bit of frustration.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Post Christmas Blues

January 5, 2015 by Leave a Comment

theft (10)Well, the 2014 Holiday Season is over; now we are dealing with the post-Christmas issues, returns, inventory and tallying up how we did! Even without official numbers you probably have an idea. Are returns higher than what you expected? Did shoplifters get more than what you were prepared to lose? One of the problems, we as business owners face, is that we get ramped up for sales but we tend to put off preparing for loses. We tell ourselves that we will get to it later. Then when that B or C priority rises to the level of serious loss, it is too late. But we all do that, with many things. It is part of running a business.

Eventually we get tired of dealing with something over and over again and decide to break the cycle. What is the saying? “Doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result, is the definition of insanity”. Thieves will not go away, in fact they will only get worse unless you deal with them head on with real business solutions. Shoplifting and employee theft are actually very simple issues to address. You will never eliminate them completely, however, you can reduce them to an expected level balancing the cost and effect.

Many retailers do not realize that they can and should attack both issues internally first. Take a look at your procedures. Step back and look at them – I mean truly LOOK at them, hard. Why are you doing something the way it is done? Is that the reason for your losses? A good example may be your cash handling procedures.  Is your till generally short? How much? Why? If your policy is that you do not make an issue out of a drawer that is $15 or less short, then you have sent the message to your employees that they can steal or be careless up to $15. Fifteen dollars multiplied by 365 days a year is A LOT of money to any retailer, large or small. All of this because of your “procedure” or attitude.

How about shoplifters? Do you really know how to prevent and stop them? Do you teach this to your employees? If you don’t you can never expect to be as profitable as you can and should be. Shoplifters will react to your efforts by going elsewhere. That is what you want. This allows you to spend more of your resources and human capital on your paying customers. Sell more, lose less should be your motto!

If you want help, we are here for you. If you do not, that is OK also. But you can fix your losses.

We wish you a great and prosperous 2015!

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Building Partnerships

January 5, 2015 by Leave a Comment

law-3Every store should have a way to build reliable partnerships with local law enforcement. For some jurisdictions, that could mean the sheriff’s department, city or county police. In some rural areas, that might even mean the state police department. There are many was to build these partnerships, and your store’s safety and security will benefit greatly from those partnerships.

What you are looking for is to have periodic visits from these law enforcement officers. Ever wonder why you see police at a donut shop? For one, the shop owners frequently give free or reduced prices on coffee to these officers. It is a nice gesture to these officers, but also an incentive to get them to frequent the shop. The more often police are in the shop chatting, drinking coffee etc, the less likely the shop is to be robbed.

Coffee and donut shops are often open late, and have only one or two people working. This makes them prime targets for robberies. Having an increased police presence helps to reduce the risk. If something were to happen, the police would quickly respond not just because that is their job, but also because they are probably on a first name basis with that shop owner and its employees. For these businesses, a cup of free coffee is a small price to pay for that kind of security and peace of mind.

Depending on the kind of store you have, giving product out for free or at a discount may not be feasible. That doesn’t mean you can’t make it worth it for local law enforcement to stop by periodically. Even though most departments shy away from case quotas, officers who do produce cases are given raises and promotions over those who don’t. By building partnerships with officers you can get some extra help with your suspected shoplifters, reduce losses, and help out your local community by giving local law enforcement tips on suspected criminal activity in your store.

Most law enforcement agencies have a community resource officer. They would be one of the first points contact to start building a relationship with. Asking if they would be willing to do a safety or security presentation for an employee meeting is a good way to break the ice. It is the first step in letting the local police know they are welcome in your store.

One of the next ways is to see if there is a retail anti theft task force set up. If so, ask if they would be interested in putting your store on their list. These task forces go into local businesses, in particular around busy holiday shopping seasons, and look for shoplifters, credit fraud, and other criminal scams. The task force will send officers into stores, generally in plainclothes, to watch cameras or do floor surveillance to spot any criminal activity.

These task forces are a free service to their retail community. While these officers are in your store, you can talk to them about what kinds of thefts you are experiencing. It also gives you an opportunity to connect with the officers and get to know who they are. These officers can become invaluable resources even after the task force is done for the season.

You now have specific officers that you can call if you have a shoplifter in your custody, or experienced a high dollar theft. The officers might be more willing to do some investigative legwork on your case, if you have built a partnership with them. Of course, part of the partnership is showing restraint and professionalism to these officers.

It is not suggested that you call them for every low dollar shortage that walk out your door, or for people who “seem suspicious” but you have no corroborating evidence. There are still laws that must be upheld regarding liable and slander. If you consistently show poor decisions about which cases to call on, you will tarnish your reputation negating any usefulness of your partnership. Remember, there is a difference between offering viable leads to confirmed inventory losses, and crying wolf over every gut feeling you have.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is Shoplifting Becoming More Violent?

December 30, 2014 by Leave a Comment

shoplifting5The detrimental effect that shoplifting has on profitability in a retail business is monumental. While businesses compete by keeping prices low, shoplifting makes it difficult for those businesses to compete at any level. Retail businesses struggle to survive in any economy, and adding shoplifting issues into their struggle make it almost impossible to be profitable. Spending millions of dollars in security cuts into their profits as well and they do not get rid of shoplifting or employee theft by doing this. All these issues make it impossible for retail stores to offers prices that can be competitive with other stores, or make sense to the consumer. Follow the stories below for more news about shoplifting.

Shoplifters caught on tape fleeing Macy’s

SARASOTA, FLA — Detectives with the Sarasota Police Department are attempting to identify two women who were caught on camera stealing merchandise from Macy’s at Westfield Southgate Mall in Sarasota.

Officers were dispatched to Macy’s on Dec. 20, 2014 in reference to two women shoplifting. The loss prevention officer for the store observed the two women taking items off shelves and concealing them in a purse and other shopping bags. The loss prevention officer called the Sarasota Police Department as soon as he noticed the two women from the office, on camera, all while keeping dispatchers on the phone updated.

When the two women attempted to leave Macy’s, the loss prevention officer asked them to come back into the store and they took off running. No subjects were located but the two women shoplifting were caught on camera. When one of the women started running, she dropped a bag of items worth nearly $1,100.

Anyone with information is encouraged to call Detective Kim Laster at 941-364-7327 or leave an anonymous tip with Crime Stoppers by calling 941-366-TIPS (8477) or online at www.sarasotacrimestoppers.com

1 suspect still at large after Christmas Eve robbery, assault

Eighteen-year-old Hunter Thompsin Ackerman and 19-year-old Eden Araque were booked into Metro Corrections Monday night after police said they were caught on surveillance video shoplifting at JC Penney.

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WHAS11) — Two of three people wanted in connection with a robbery and beating at the Mall St. Matthews are now behind bars.

Eighteen-year-old Hunter Thompsin Ackerman and 19-year-old Eden Araque were booked into Metro Corrections Monday night after police said they were caught on surveillance video shoplifting at JC Penney.

Police said the trio stole nearly $400 worth of merchandise and assaulted a loss prevention officer when she tried to stop them Dec. 24. According to police records, the employee suffered a broken nose during the assault..

APD reports string of violent shoplifting cases

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. —As the holiday shopping season comes to a close, Albuquerque police say they’ve seen a substantial increase in shoplifting cases this December with offenders brandishing deadly weapons.

Officer Tanner Tixier couldn’t provide specific numbers, but says shoplifting cases where an offender threatens a store employee with a weapon have become all too common this holiday season.

“These attacks are becoming more and more prevalent,” Tixier said. During these attacks, Tixier says loss prevention officers who are trained to spot and confront shoplifters are being threatened.

“These criminals have the ability to escalate their violence very rapidly,” Tixier said.

Filed Under: Shoplifting Prevention Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , ,

Holiday Help

December 5, 2014 by Leave a Comment

theft (13)The Help Wanted signs, advertisements, and postings are already popping up across the country. Retailers nationwide are starting the process of hiring their holiday help. By hiring them in October and Early November, retailers anticipate that these employees will be trained and ready for the big day after Thanksgiving sales, and throughout the holiday shopping season.

The plus side to hiring temporary help, whether it is during the winter holidays, or the summer garden season, is that the employees are there for the hours and days only when the store actually needs them. Hiring on a seasonal or temporary basis allows the retailers to terminate the employment at the end of the season with little future responsibility in the form of unemployment or severance benefits. This doesn’t mean that it is a one-sided employment relationship.

These temporary jobs are a great solution for people looking to make some extra money to pay for holiday gifts or toys. Teachers who have the summer off can pick up additional work that will not interfere when the school year starts back up. Many temporary workers are hard working, and enjoy the freedom that a temporary position gives them. Other temporary workers do so in the hopes of proving themselves worthy of a permanent position after the season is over.

The downside to hiring temporary help, regardless of time of year, is that many of these employees will not have a sense of ownership or loyalty for the company they are working for. In particular, near the end of their employment these disengaged employees who are about to be let go might try to take a little extra for themselves on their way out the door.

Just as with any other employee theft case where the employee steals because they feel they are owed additional compensation, temporary employees can fall into this same mentality. Perhaps it is because they were not offered a permanent position, or perhaps they feel like they gave up more of their holidays than what they realized they would working these seasonal hours, it is easy for a temporary employee to decide they want more.

With no ownership, a limited time frame of their employments, and a sense of entitlement, many seasonal employees historically end up in employee theft situations. These losses cut into very critical profits, as seasonal/ holiday sales often make or break a store’s financial success for the year. It is also problematic due to the short time frame that these crimes are executed within.

Typically, employees who steal do not want to leave their jobs. They might stay at a particular employer for years, building their safety net and refining their methods. They will usually escalate over a period of time, starting with very small thefts to see what they can get away with. This gives anyone investigating a pattern of shortages discovered over a period of time to look for and follow.

When a seasonal hire decides to steal, they know that they might only have a matter of a few months, or only a few weeks to take all that they can. They might decide to only make one large theft, or multiple small thefts that might not pop up on anyone’s radar. From an investigative standpoint, it is often too late to determine who is causing these shortages. By the time the losses are discovered, or a pattern of theft appears, the employee could have already left their employment.

One of the best ways to prevent these losses is to execute all policies and procedures at 100%, especially during these overly busy times. Any breech of policy is more likely to quickly red flag. Seasonal hires should not be given access to keys, codes, alarms, etc. Leave those to a permanent employee. Finally, conducting mini investigations during the season will help uncover any potential theft risks while they are happening, instead of waiting to find evidence after the fact.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , ,

Negative On Hands

December 1, 2014 by Leave a Comment

shoplifting2When you are conducting perpetual inventories, you are constantly assessing your stock levels. By maintaining accurate stock levels, you are ensuring your customers will have access to the merchandise they are looking for. This creates consistent customer service and maximizes your store’s sales potential. Having an accurate on hand inventory also helps you to reduce your cost of goods by eliminating erroneous inventory orders, as well as identifies potential theft issues more readily.

To have an accurate on hand inventory, you need to have a system in place that captures your inventory movement at the SKU level. This system should recognize any time an item comes in or goes out of your store. This should include receipt of product from the vendor, sales, customer returns, returns to vendors, and miscellaneous usage like damages or store use. You should also have a way to manually make inventory adjustments through processes like cycle counts or inventory replenishment audits.

By maintaining these counts and processes, you should be able to look at any given product and know exactly how many of this item you have. This helps you prepare for sales and special promotions, or to satisfy a larger than normal quantity purchase by a customer. Cycle counts are an invaluable tool in ensuring these counts are up to date and accurate.

A cycle count is a manual count done by a store employee to determine if what the store’s computer system says you should have on hand matches with what you actually have on hand. For example, you are preparing an end cap to be filled with “Item A” for an upcoming sale this weekend. Your on hand inventory says you should have 20 of the item, so you go and look to find all 20 pieces. After searching the sales floor, you discover that you can only find 15 pieces. So you take those 15 to the end cap and enter a cycle count adjustment into the computer system to subtract the missing 5 pieces. Your computer now says that you only have 15 pieces, and you have a shortage of five pieces.

After the weekend is over, all of “Item A” was sold. Your inventory tracking system shows that you have -5 on hand. Negative 5? That indicates that you sold more than what you physically had on hand. Hmm. Something is very clearly off.

One very likely possibility is that when the employee was looking to fill the end cap, they did not look in the back stock room to see if there was any merchandise there. During the weekend, another employee found the missing 5 pieces and restocked the end cap for the sale. Because the employee had cycle counted and adjusted the items out of the inventory, a negative was created when the “missing” five pieces were sold.

This is one example of why it is important to maintain an accurate inventory, even when a manual adjustment is made. When the employee made the adjustment, there was the potential to accidentally order more product than what was needed. If the computer system thought that there was less than what you actually had, an order could have been generated to get the stock levels back to where your store should be. Because the product was physically still in the store, you could have been left with extra product that you didn’t need.

Having a negative on hand of an item means that a recount should be made quickly to determine what the error was and have it fixed. Adjusting your inventory back up to the actual stock levels will not create an overage.

This is not extra product that you didn’t have before. Think of it like loosing a five-dollar bill and not knowing where it went. Then the next winter, you pull out your coat, reach into the pocket and find a five-dollar bill. That money did not magically appear. It was your money that you misplaced and later found.

Fixing your negative on hands does not add extra to your inventory, or your bottom line. It fixes your inventory where a shortage was previously created in error.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Shrinking Margins? Internal Controls Can Help

September 18, 2014 by Leave a Comment

shoplifting4Occupational fraud is a problem for most businesses, both large and small. Fraud is committed when an employee, through a deliberate and usually illegal process, misuses or misappropriates the resources or assets of a business for their own benefit. It’s willful and deliberate worker misconduct, which causes the business to suffer financially due to theft of time, services, inventory or money.

This type of fraud is such a widespread and injurious problem that approximately 1/3 of small businesses close due to it, mostly because it goes undetected. This is a regrettable situation, because it’s largely preventable if properly monitored internal controls are in place. It’s usually uncovered only by accident or through a whistleblower.

Actively managed internal controls can prevent or detect most types of misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting. They’re processes created to track and achieve goals in specific categories (i.e. operations, time keeping, inventory, financial reporting and compliance with applicable laws and regulations). While most of these processes are universal, specific ones may need to be added to address unusual situations or particular fraud concerns.

These controls should include operations and finances. They’re designed to create a system which protects assets through prevention and timely detection of unauthorized or illegal employee behavior. Some of these processes include: monitoring the flow of paperwork; reading, understanding and acting on financial reports; noticing and acting on the behaviors and attitudes of employees; listening to and acting on employee tips and hints about problems.

To start creating internal control measures a business can review past and current procedures, events and concerns – the company’s strengths and weaknesses, investigate and evaluate employee complaints, acknowledge and list all of the problems/symptoms, etc. This is done in a methodical timely way. It’s important to note that the controls are fluid and will need to be reviewed and changed over time.

Well managed, easy to use and structured internal controls are considered to be one of the most effective deterrents to occupational fraud. However, these controls are only paper work if management doesn’t take action. No program, by itself, will keep employees from stealing. Supervisors must be responsible and take action if it’s to be effective.

Opportunity (lack of controls) and ineffective or no consequences are 2 of the main reasons employees commit fraud. It’s unreasonable and naïve for mangers to expect their workers to be atypical. Yet they do, only to be taken advantage of. Unfortunately, many have learned this lesson the hard way.

Nicole Abbott – writer, educator and psycho-therapist

 

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , ,

When There Are Children Involved

September 5, 2014 by Leave a Comment

theft (10)When we think about shoplifters and creating policies on what how to apprehend them, and what to do with them during and after the initial confrontation, we are doing so with a general image in mind. We are acting on an image of an adult shoplifter, who may or may not become physically aggressive. What many owners and managers frequently overlook is what to do when there are children involved during the shoplifting incident.

There is a sad reality that many shoplifting situations do involve children. Sometimes it is actually the children (or minors under the age of 18) that are the ones stealing. Sometimes it is adults- parents, caregivers, relatives- that bring children along while the adult is stealing. In some very unfortunate examples, the adults might actually be teaching and encouraging the children to steal for them.

As a result, policies and procedures should be in place to account for these situations. If you are trying to figure out what to do while the incident is already underway, you can end up in serious trouble if you make the wrong judgment call. So here is a quick overview of how to handle some of these situations.

What to do if a shoplifter is a child/ minor under 18 years of age? Start by determining if there is a responsible party somewhere in the store. This needs to be someone over the age of 18 that can oversee custody of the child. It should be a parent or guardian of some sort. A minor babysitter, older sibling, or friend is not who you want.

Next step is to use your best judgment for the shoplifter’s intent. A four year old taking a candy bar has less criminal intent than a seventeen year old stealing a pair of jeans. Determine from there if you are calling the police to prosecute. Ideally any juvenile in your custody should be released to either a parent or guardian, or the police within thirty minutes or less. Always have a witness present when you have a child in your custody. Never release a child out on their own, as you can be held liable if they are hurt, etc after leaving your store.

If the shoplifter is an adult, and they have children present, decide if you are calling the police or not. If you are prosecuting the adult, make sure the local law enforcement are aware that there are children present. They will need to make special arrangements for those children. While the adult shoplifter is in your custody, under no circumstances should the children be separated from that adult.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: , , , , , , , , ,

Shoplifting News and Other Stories

September 4, 2014 by Leave a Comment

theft (3)Employee theft costs the retail industry millions of dollars daily, and although the majority of shoplifters are non professionals, the monetary harm they can inflict to a business can be devastating. Employee theft can be undetected by the employer or management for months or even years, and some of the small businesses do not report the theft to authorities when the shoplifter is caught. How can you protect your business from employee theft or shoplifting?Are you doing enough to protect your business from losses? Do you need solutions for your business and don’t know where to start? call us and we will be happy to talk to you about your business needs.

To read more about shoplifting news follow the links below.

Employee at Wal-Mart in Franklin charged with theft

The Franklin Police Department received a complaint Friday about a possible employee theft at Wal-Mart.

Police were told that the employee, Timothy Youngblood, 43, who worked in sporting goods, stole about $5,000 worth of merchandise over the span of a few months, according to a news release from Franklin police.

Two Franklin officers watched store surveillance video, and officers recovered about $1,068 worth of Wal-Mart property from Youngblood’s East Cedar Street home. Police found sporting goods, tents, appliances, cookware, gourmet coffee and high-end coffee brewers.

Youngblood was charged with theft by unlawful taking over $500 but less than $10,000. His wife, Shawn M. Snay-Youngblood,

Pennsylvania’s top court rules $75,000 fine for employee’s theft at casino illegal

The state Supreme Court on Tuesday found that a mandatory $75,000 fine imposed upon a poker dealer convicted of stealing $200 from the Rivers Casino is unconstitutional.

“The fine at issue here, both in an absolute sense and in a comparative sense, is strikingly disproportionate to the manner in which other crimes are punished in Pennsylvania. That the fine is mandatory merely exacerbates the disproportion,” wrote Chief Justice Ronald Castille in the unanimous, 33-page opinion.

Matthew Eisenberg, 29, was charged with misdemeanor theft under the Gaming Act after taking $200 in poker chips from Nov. 26-30, 2010, from the gaming table where he worked at the Rivers.

Knox Trustee’s ‘ghost employee’ found guilty of theft

A Knox County jury on Friday agreed with the state: Former Trustee’s Office employee Delbert Morgan was a “mystery,” a “phantom” and a “ghost.”

He rarely if ever worked. And yet he collected almost $152,000 in salary and benefits during the four years he was with the county’s tax collection office.

The jury, after a two-week long trial, found the 58-year-old Grainger County businessman guilty of felony theft, a charge that is punishable by eight to 12 years in prison.

Morgan, who can also receive probation, will be sentenced on Oct. 23.

“He may have done a little work, but the state submits that it was bad from the beginning,” prosecutor Bill Bright told the jury during closing arguments Friday.

Fellow prosecutor John Gill agreed.

After the verdict was read, he said that Bright “did an unbelievable job making a complicated case clear.”

Filed Under: Shoplifting Prevention Tagged With: , , , , , , , ,
« Previous Page
Next Page »