Warning Signals of Theft by Outsiders

theft (2)Last month I discussed the Warning Signals of Employee Theft. Employees account for an average of 45% of a Retailer’s losses. However, shoplifters and vendors account for another 35% on average.

As business owners we work hard to run our business. We deal with a number of liabilities every day and people who have never owned a business rarely understand that. We have to keep a number of balls rolling on the table at the same time: Sales, inventory, ordering, human resources, payroll, insurance and expenses just to name a few of the more common ones.

Contrary to current reports and opinion we see in the news more and more, we business owners are not the evil, money hording ogres that is sometimes portrayed. We work hard for our profits and many times we invest most of that back into the businesses.

So when someone steals from us regardless of the amount or type, it is a huge hit to our bottom line. What many Retailers do not understand is the impact. Theft of toilet paper or cleaning supplies from our restroom has the same impact as the theft of merchandise. It still costs us money and we have to replace it.

Many Retailers do not understand the true impact of shrink or loss. For example: If your store’s shrinkage this year is $100,000, that’s $273.97 in shrinkage every day.  Is that the total impact on the bottom line?

Consider this: For your organization to simply recover or break even on a $100,000 shrink or loss, you would have to sell an additional $13,698.50 every day!  ($273.97 divided by .02% profit margin) This is on top of your normal sales.      

Think about this…how many more items would you have to order, receive, count, mark, prepare paperwork for, stock, and finally sell just to produce these extra sales?

Add to this the fact that shrinkage really cannot be recovered. You then begin to understand why one-third of US business failures are blamed on theft.

The obvious solution is to prevent the theft, errors and abuse that cause loss in the first place. To that end here is a list of early warning signals of theft by shoplifters and outsiders to our business:

1. Unusually large or frequent refunds to a particular customer for returned merchandise.

2. Anonymous phone calls or letters concerning theft.

3. Unusually friendly relationships among employees and outsiders such as truck drivers, repairmen and trash collectors.

4. Frequent contact among employees and visitors (that do not appear to be customers), especially those visitors who carry shopping bags or other containers.

5. Contact by employees with gamblers, drug dealers, gang members, loan sharks, etc.

6. Many customers that always deal with one employee and refuse to buy from anyone else.

7. Your stock being sold in outlets, e-bay…. That never buy from the company.

8. Gifts or favors to accounts payable employees from suppliers or to accounts receivable employees from customers.

9. Reduced purchases by customers who deal closely with warehouse or shipping personnel.

10. Presence of outside personnel (telephone repair, building service, salesmen, etc.) in areas where they have no legitimate business, or in un-business like communication with employees.

11. Newly received items being sold in flea markets, e-bay, on-line….

12. Complaints received from other businesses or retailers.

13. Shoplifters are always blamed for the theft.

14. Gifts or favors from other retailers accepted by your employees.

Remember – It is of greater benefit to us to anticipate losses, procedural defects or lax enforcement of controls, then to concentrate only on resolving losses that should have never occurred.


Warning Signals Of Employee Theft

theft (2)As Business Owners we are “hit” with something that we did not or could not see coming. A piece of equipment breaks, a key employee is in an accident and gone for an extended period of time, etc.  Many times this also applies to employee theft: We simply did not see it coming.

However, there is a difference with employee theft and the first two examples. Employee theft is usually preceded by warning signals. Many Business Owners and Managers simply do not know what they are or do not see the forest for the trees.

When you look at this list, keep something in mind. One of these things, all by themselves probably mean nothing but in my 35 years of dealing personally with 2300+ employee theft investigations, I have found that most of the time two or more of these factors are present in enough time that a responsible party should have seen the warning signals. 

Personal behavior is the key area to watch:

1.Double talk or inconsistencies by an employee who is explaining discrepancies or “errors”.

2.Borrowing, particularly from loan sharks, but also habitual borrowing of any kind.

3.Symptoms of a drug user.

4.Admission of theft from prior employer.

5.Violent temper or other unpleasant behavior, which tends to discourage people from asking questions.

6.Expensive habits such as heavy drinking, drugs, extra-marital affairs.

7.Having more money or spending more than earnings could support:

–  Flashes big roll of money

–  Buys expensive items–jewelry, car, house, boat

–  Has expensive hobby

–  Always picks up check at restaurant

–  Dresses expensively

8.Disgruntled, dislikes boss or company and complains about being underpaid or overworked.

9.Heavy gambling on horses, cards, numbers, sports, etc.

10.Abnormal fear of, or antagonism toward, security or management personnel.

11.Possession of knife, gun or other weapon.

12.Terrorization of one employee by another.

13.Advocating violence as a way to resolve routine problems.

14.Never takes time off or vacation, comes in during vacation or day off.

15.Concealed family relationships among associates.

16.Chronic employee conversations that cease when management approaches.

17.Employees who never make purchases.

18.Employees who are “wary” of members of management.

19.Constant complainers.

Too often, signals pointing to internal theft, even when noticed, are mistakenly ascribed to chance, error, coincidence, or some other benign circumstance…and the signals are ignored.

Remember, a thief, like a magician, depends on you misinterpreting the obvious…or on his or her ability to confuse you.  Don’t be deceived, distracted or misled.


Take a Bite out of Shoplifting – Literally

shoplifting5Shoplifters are great. Well, not great for business, but great for laughs sometimes. Most of the times, shoplifting incidents are pretty serious business. You’re confronting someone who has just committed a crime. You don’t know their state of mind and you definitely don’t know what they are capable of. I’ve personally been pepper sprayed by a shoplifter as they tried to escape, along with seeing countless managers suffer the same fate. Often suspects immediately want to become physical and more simply will flee the store. Every now and then karma and a little luck is on your side.

I was training a new LP agent last summer in a very active market. It was day four of our training and she had already thrown a half dozen folks in jail. So far, no problems, this particular agent was an attractive young female who didn’t take lip from ANYONE! It was amazing how many shoplifters hit on her… but we’ll save those stories for another time. The clock was ticking away and it was just about time to call it a night when one of our frequent flyers entered the store. I had busted this guy on no less than three previous thefts and he was definitely a runner. I had my new agent begin observation while I contacted the police. At the very least, I was going to charge him with trespassing. 

About 15 minutes goes by and like always, the shoplifter starts loading his pants up with electronics. About this time, the police were arriving, so I went outside to inform them of the situation and wait for the thief and my agent to exit the store. Well, she didn’t disappoint. Our thief exits, but completely ignores the agent and takes off running. The next thing I know he’s gone. He’s hiding around the vehicles in the parking lot, but we can’t seem to find him. The officer gets on his loudspeaker and announces that he’s going to let the K-9 unit loose if he doesn’t turn himself in. No answer. 

Standing a full 3.5 feet tall and weighing in at about 120 pounds, K-9 Officer Scout is ready for action. This is a game for the pooch and I can tell he’s ready to play. Within seconds of jumping out of the patrol car, he and his handler are on the scent. Like a scene from a movie, out of nowhere, the shoplifter emerges. Only… he doesn’t surrender. In true idiot fashion, he starts sprinting across the parking lot. I don’t care how fast you think you are; you will never outrun a German shepherd whose sole purpose in life is to take you down. And take him down he did. When the handler finally reached the scene the shoplifter had a knife he was trying to stab the K-9 officer with. Not only did this shoplifter go to jail with some pretty serious bite wounds, he also got to feel what 100,000 volts of electricity from a Taser felt like. 


Shoplifting and the Law

theft (3)

Some have called shoplifting the silent crime that is plaguing the US. Shoplifting for some people is considered their full time job, and retail organized crime is abundant in this country.  Shoplifting affects small business owners tremendously and  the retail industry as a whole lose millions of dollars yearly passing the loss to the consumer and therefore affecting you financially.

Shoplifting is a serious crime ,and some states are taking strong measures to make sure the penalties applied to the shoplifter are harsh. To read more follow the links below.


Retail merchants fear theft bill will increase crime

HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) –

Retail Merchants of Hawaii president Sheri Sakamoto said a bill to raise the threshold for felony theft from $300 to $750 will encourage shoplifters to steal more.

“It will really affect retailers specifically. They now can steal up to $749.99 and have less consequences to their crime,” she said

Rep. Karl Rhoads is chairman of the House Judiciary committee. He said the bill targets agricultural theft, and shoplifting is considered separate but prosecutors do have leeway. “Even if the Governor signs this bill it’s still a crime to steal amounts between $300 and $750, it’s just the penalty is not as high,” he said.

Theft is a Class C felony, punishable by up to five years in prison. Advocates for raising the dollar threshold say $300 is way too low, and it costs taxpayers about $49,000 a year to incarcerate an offender. “So when we’re talking about property crime that’s under $1,000 and we’re paying $134 a day, you’ve got to start looking at that and saying, That really doesn’t pencil out,” Community Alliance on Prisons advocate Kat Brady said.


Shoplifting gangs operating on ‘industrial scale’

PROSECUTORS have vowed to smash serious organised crime groups who are using “steal to order” shoplifting to fund their illegal activities.

The Crown Office said shoplifting was happening on an “industrial scale”, with some groups travelling from overseas to target Scottish retailers.

More than 200 people have now been identified as being involved in what prosecutors called “professional shoplifting”.

The details emerged as the Crown Office published figures showing £8.6 million has been seized in 2014/15 under the Proceeds of Crime Act (Poca).
The money includes assets seized from the gangs, as well as from brothel keepers, money launderers, and drug dealers.

Solicitor General Lesley Thomson said specialist prosecutors had worked closely with a dedicated police inquiry team during the past year to dismantle shoplifting groups, who specialise in targeting expensive clothing and designer handbags.


Battling The $36 Billion U.S. Problem Of Retail Shrinkage Losses

The financial cost of retail shrinkage is huge. The latest Annual Shrink Report issued by Dr. Richard Hollinger and Dr. Read Hayes at the University of Florida puts the total at $36 billion annually.

Shrinkage has several causes: customers shoplifting , employee theft, supplier fraud and administrative errors.

Frequent inventories and accounting audits counts can catch administrative errors and supplier fraud. But stopping shrinkage caused by theft is a larger undertaking.

“There are two kinds of thieves,”says Keith Aubele, CPP, president and CEO of the Bentonville, Ark.-based Retail Loss Prevention Group. “First, there is the opportunistic non-pro. Second, there are professionals working in Organized Retail Crime Syndicates (ORCS) — vast organizations that buy stolen goods from professional thieves for pennies on the dollar and then repackage and resell the goods to mom-and-pop stores, back into the retail pipeline, internationally — through any of a number of markets for stolen goods.

“Employees are the front line of defense — as well as the most economical defense — against shrinkage losses.”


Background checks and What to Look for

theft (1)When hiring  a new employee and you need to do a background check, Do you know what you need to look for to make sure you have the right candidate?  First of all, you need to be knowledgeable about the laws regarding background checks in your state.  What Washington seems reasonable, may not quite cut it for California and vice versa.   Due you due diligence before attempting to do a background check without knowing the Ins and outs of the law.  Make sure that your process about hiring and doing background checks are consistent throughout the company, you do not want to be the target of an employee discrimination lawsuit because of different treatment to different possible candidates.

Read more by following the links below.



Retail Industry Update, No. 3, September 2013: EEOC Loses (Again) On Criminal-Background Checks

 Last year, we wrote about the EEOC’s then-new guidance on the use of criminal-background checks in hiring decisions. [“Using Conviction Records As A Screening Tool,” Retail Industry Update, June 2012].  In December 2012, the Commission issued a strategic enforcement plan that included targeting background checks as a barrier to employment of minorities. In June of this year, the Commission trumpeted the filing of lawsuits against Dollar General and BMW North America claiming their use of criminal convictions in hiring violates Title VII.

But these latest lawsuits were not the EEOC’s first attempt to challenge an employer’s alleged blanket use of criminal-background checks in hiring. In 2009, prior to the publication of the latest guidance, it sued Freeman Companies in federal court in South Carolina alleging that the manner in which Freeman used background checks had a disparate impact on minorities. Recently, the district court sent the EEOC packing with its tail between its legs.


 The Background Check Checklist: Avoiding Pitfalls in Screening Process

There was a time when employment background checks were reserved for those entering very specific careers; government jobs with access to sensitive information, those working closely with children or finances and a handful of other public-facing corporate positions.

But in the last two decades, technology has made conducting background checks faster, cheaper and more convenient for employers. According to data from the Society of Human Resource Management, 73 percent of employers use criminal background checks on employees.

Job applicants applying for almost any level of position in nearly every industry are far more likely to have to pass a background check as a pre-requisite for employment. For example, employers in the transportation, health care and retail industries often use background screening services of consumer reporting agencies.


 Our Brave New World of Employment Background Checks

With unemployment stubbornly high, even a small problem can be enough to keep you from getting a job. And thanks to modern technology, employers are a lot more likely to be aware of these problems. Obviously a prison record has always made it hard to find a job. A poor credit report can blackball you these days. And today the New York Times reports on a new breed of databases that track retail employees accused of stealing:

Retailers “don’t want to take a chance on hiring somebody that they might have a problem with,” said Richard Mellor, the [National Retail Federation’s] vice president for loss prevention.

But the databases, which are legal, are facing scrutiny from labor lawyers and federal regulators, who worry they are so sweeping that innocent employees can be harmed. The lawyers say workers are often coerced into confessing, sometimes when they have done nothing wrong, without understanding that they will be branded as thieves.


What You Need To Know About Background Checks

image3-NEOBIZMAG

Many small businesses think twice about hiring a new employee, especially if that business is going through a rough time.  The actual cost of hiring a new employee is expensive, and not only because of the salary they will be paying.  Recruiting and training alone will be costly, not to mention the time spend for interviewing the possible candidates.  Hiring the right candidate can become quite an ordeal, but by doing background checks on an employee before hiring them can save you time and money in the long run.


 Class Action: Amazon Violates Federal Law With Employee Background Checks

 Amazon.com Inc. and a staffing company that aids the online retailer in its hiring are facing a class action lawsuit, alleging that they have violated federal law because they did not disclose the information found in a background check that was used to deny employment.

Plaintiff Gregory Williams claims in his class action lawsuit filed on Wednesday in Washington state federal court that Amazon and Staff Management Solutions, which is also called SMX, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Williams claims that he applied for a job with Amazon as a “puller” at one of the online retailer’s distribution centers in November 2013. SMX helps Amazon with hiring at its fulfillment centers primarily in anticipation of seasonal hiring.

As part of the application process, Williams also filled out a form giving SMX the authority “to obtain his consumer report for employment purposes.” That form stated that if anything is found in the background check that could affect his employment that he would be given a copy as well as an explanation of his rights under the FCRA. It also stated that the information can be disputed if the applicant deems that it is inaccurate.


Georgia Background Checks: What you need to know

There are a number of ways for employers to gather information on the background of an applicant for employment. Employers may simply call an applicant’s former employer to confirm the applicant’s dates of employment and title and to try to obtain a more detailed reference from a supervisor. However, more and more frequently, employers are hiring third parties to conduct background checks on applicants who have been offered employment. In addition, depending on the nature of the position, employers are requesting reports about an applicant’s driving record, criminal record, and/or credit history. There are often legal limits on employers obtaining and using this type of information. When employers hire a third party to conduct a background check or obtain reports from outside agencies, such reports are subject to the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and state laws. In Georgia, employers must comply with laws concerning criminal background checks and driver’s record information.


Background Check Industry at a Crossroads: Raising Uptime Standards

Why does uptime matter?

In today’s lightning-paced business climate, companies and organizations in virtually every industry are paying more attention than ever to the speed, efficiency and dependability of the systems, software and other support tools that enable them to serve and retain customers and thrive in an increasingly competitive global economy. It’s an era of Google, Amazon and smartphone-enabled instant gratification, and we expect immediate answers to all of our questions and same-day shipment of every conceivable consumer product. And companies’ system availability, or uptime,makes this all possible.

Companies are also under heightened scrutiny from regulators, and from their own internal auditors, to meet stricter accounting and reporting guidelines, to prepare for every possible disaster scenario that could disrupt their business or their customers’ business, and to operate more efficiently in everything they do. Uptime is at the very core of all these concerns.


Background Checks Should be Standard Operating Procedure

theft (13)It’s not every day that I bring someone new to my team. I’m a regional Loss Prevention Manager and I manage a very small, but highly motivated and productive team. I need someone to work independently, make good business decisions and get results all with very minimal supervision. I also need someone that is of good moral character and has integrity above all else. Normally, when I have an open position, it will take me weeks to fill. I’m extremely selective and always go with the person that I know will fit into my team the best. So running a background check is one of the first things I do when I have a potential candidate, and it should be something you do as well.

It wasn’t all that long ago when I was looking for a market investigator. The position had been posted for a few weeks and I had already interviewed a group of candidates. I had narrowed it down to three and had to make a hiring decision. They all had tons of experience working investigations, retail operations or law enforcement. I knew who I wanted and made a job offer, which was contingent on the successful completion of a background check. We shook hands and he assured me that his record was clean.

A few days later, my background check company sent the results back to me. I was completely taken back. What seemed like a very qualified, motivated person was a complete fraud. His rap sheet was ¼ mile long and he was recently convicted of several counts of fraud. There was absolutely no way I could bring this person onto my team. Had it not been for a solid background check, this person could have potentially cost me and my company thousands of dollars and untold hours of frustration and heartache. This should be a lesson to any owner out there. It doesn’t matter how clean someone appears to be, how well the interview, or even how great their resume may look, there’s always the potential for skeletons to be hiding just below the surface. Do yourself, and your business a favor and always run a background check on new employees. 


The Truth About Internal Theft

theft (2)Do you know what small business owners and Loss Prevention professionals have in common? In my career, I have found that there is no other business unit in a retail company more concerned about the financial health of the company than the LP department. Our life goal is to SAVE money, all while finding ways to increase sales and profitability, improve margins and assist in improving operational efficiency. Doesn’t that sound like a savvy business owner to you? Reversely, as a small business owner, you’re plagued by theft. You may also find yourself asking, where is that theft coming from?

If you do some online research, you’ll probably find a ton of sites and quotes that all say internal theft causes more financial damage than external. Well, that’s not entirely true. External theft has steadily been on the rise and causes millions of dollars in loss every year. The same also holds true for internal theft. What these statistics do though, is misrepresent internal theft. Yes, your employees sometimes steal from you, but that doesn’t mean 1 out of every 3 are. What that means is those employees who do engage in theft, are taking you for a LOT more than an average shoplifter. Last year alone, personally, I managed over 650 cases. 540 were shoplifters. The dollar amounts associated with those cases were almost the same in both the internal/external category. 

Take this for example. Last year, I was contacted by some inventory control guys regarding a specific electronic device at a store location. We looked at a store inventory report and it showed that this one sku was showing a negative 600 on hand at this location. By investigating transaction records, we found these units had been refunded to the store over a period of time. Further investigation showed that a single cashier had conducted nearly 600 refunds of this particular sku and was able to pocket nearly $65,000 in cash from ghost refunds. It would take a lot of shoplifters to equal that dollar amount, but this was only ONE employee.

What I want owners and managers to understand is the reality of the internal theft problem. Understand that not all of your employees are thieves, but that 1% that will steal from you, will steal over and over again. As an owner, you should have internal control measures in place that limit your exposure to losses, and at the very least, a descent CCTV to review those losses when they are uncovered. While shrink will always be a part of life in retail, you have the power and the tools to make that financial impact as less as humanly possible.  


The Costs of “Wardrobing”

theft (10)According to the National Retail Federation’s annual survey, it is estimated the industry loses approximately $9.1 billion yearly in return fraud.  This includes refunds on merchandising that has been stolen and a practice like “wardrobing” that is costing retailers this incredible amount. Those incidents are done by employees as well as shoppers and shoplifters.  To read more about this topic follow the links below for more information.


NOT-SO-HAPPY RETURNS: RETAIL FEDERATION HIGHLIGHTS “WARDROBING” COSTS

In a new survey, the National Retail Federation says that holiday-return fraud could end up costing stores billions this year. The worst part? This scam is more organized than ever.

The holidays are over, but stores big and small will be dealing with more than the memories.

That’s according to the National Retail Federation (NRF), which reported late last month that during the holiday season alone, retailers could face as much as $3.8 billion in lost revenue from fraudulent returns, an increase from $3.4 billion in 2013 and a big chunk of the estimated $10.9 billion in return fraud in 2014 as a whole.

The organization’s 2014 Return Fraud Survey [PDF], which gathered responses from loss-prevention executives at 60 retailers, shows that retailers suspect that 5.5 percent of holiday returns are fraudulent. And while technology has helped curb illegitimate returns, NRF said, there’s only so much companies can do about retail fraud, which is often suspected to be the work of crime rings.


Eliminate the Practice of Wardrobing in Your Store

Well here’s a new one to me.  The art of wardrobing.  It’s a term coined for shoppers who buy merchandise with the full intent of using it, then returning it for a full refund.  Take a read of the article as the insight is fascinating.

I was astounded to learn that “nearly two-thirds of merchants had items wardrobed in 2007, up from 56 percent the year before, the first year the National Retail Federation (NRF) started tracking the trend,” according to the article.

The term wardrobing was chosen (I’m guessing) because it stems from clothing that’s been purchased, worn and then returned.  But the article points out that wardrobing has taken on a broader meaning and is now applied to any merchandise that’s been used and then returned.

So how big is wardrobing?  The article points out that “Wardrobers want to rent the things they want or need for free, which amounts to fraud, said Richard Hollinger, a criminology professor at the University of Florida who specializes in retail theft. He said return fraud, which includes wardrobing, fake receipts, and other practices, cost retailers an estimated $10.8 billion last year, up from $9.6 billion in 2006.”


RETURN FRAUD COST 9.1 BILLION IN 2013

Criminals trying to get refunds on stolen merchandise and customers engaged in practices like “wardrobing” cost retailers an estimated $9.1 billion in return fraud last year, according to NRF’s annual survey.

“While coverage of this issue paints return fraud as one of the less severe retail crimes, the fact of the matter is that returning used or stolen merchandise — or even using false tender to purchase items — is fraud, period,” NRF vice president for loss prevention Rich Mellor said in a release accompanying the survey. “Efforts to combat fraudulent activity are slowly starting to work, but criminals are becoming more savvy and technologically advanced in their methods.”

The dollar amount of fraud was up 2.8 percent from 2012, but the proportion of returns believed to be fraudulent (3.4 percent) remained the same. During the just-finished holiday season, fraud totaled an estimated $3.4 billion.

Fraud was experienced by virtually all retailers, with stolen merchandise involved in 95 percent of cases. Employee fraud accounted for 93 percent of incidents; 69 percent were returns of items purchased with fraudulent payment like stolen or counterfeit gift cards. Wardrobing — where customers typically purchase a dress for a party or a big-screen television for the Super Bowl and return the item after it has been used — accounted for 62 percent.


Social Media and Employee Theft

theft (2)There isn’t anything I enjoy more than catching an employee stealing. Whether it be through a lengthy investigation, or through an anonymous tip, it’s very satisfying to me. The idea that you employ someone, put money in their pocket and a chance to succeed, but they steal from you, eats at the pit of my stomach. I can’t stand a thief and to me, it’s even worse when it’s an employee. Throughout my career in Loss Prevention, I’ve handling thousands of employee theft cases. Most don’t really stand out to me, but there are a handful of stories that I like to share when I have the chance.

Social media has really changed the way we communicate and share information. Personally, I rarely watch the 9 O’clock news anymore. I just log into Twitter, or Facebook and see if there is anything relevant to me. No more are our personal communications private. Using social media as a communication device gives the entire world visibility to everything you say, or do. So, if you’re a thief, you should probably know this. 

Recently I was having some issues with shoes in my store. I was constantly finding less expensive brands in the more expensive boxes. I started off finding one or two a month, so I chalked it up to a shipping error from the factory. As the weeks progressed, I began to find more and more, and I quickly realized I had a potential thief. I started running the sales for the cheaper shoes and noticed that one individual had purchased every single pair that I had found. Inside those boxes were no doubt the more expensive shoes, but who was this guy? I hadn’t a clue, and without any good leads, my case went cold. Until one of my employees helped me crack the case. 

I was closing the store one Saturday night and a few hours before closing time, I started making the rounds to make sure everyone was zoning and cleaning up so we could get out at a decent time. I noticed one of my footwear employees on the computer in the manager’s office, so I started walking that way. He noticed I was heading in his direction, so he quickly left the area. A little while later, I went to check sales on that same computer and noticed there was a window still open. It was that employee’s Facebook page. 

I maximized the screen, at first not realizing it was his page. What I saw shocked and amused me all at the same time. The window that opened was his private messages. Out of curiosity, I perused a bit. There, in the open, was a long conversation between my employee and a friend of his. The employee basically taking an order for shoes. My employee described how he would put the shoes in a cheaper pair, where to find them and even what cashier to check out with. I had found my shoe culprit, in the most awesome way possible. I printed out the page and a few days later, after letting his friend buy the stolen shoes, confronted the employee. He admitted to the several thousand dollars’ worth of theft and implicated several others in the store as doing the same. In total, I lost 5 employees. To this day, he has no idea that he led me to himself, and I have no plans on telling him!